🔗 Share this article

Over the weekend, the game developers introduced a fresh game mode called Casual Breakthrough. In essence, this option resembles the regular Breakthrough format but features a few notable adjustments:

• Each team has only eight real players, with the rest filled by AI-controlled opponents.
• Actions performed by human gamers award complete experience points, while AI activities provide lower rewards.
• Just a pair of locations can be played: Cairo Siege and Empire State.
• Elements like Dogtags, accolades, and stat tracking have been turned off.

In short, this mode delivers on its name: it offers a casual version of Breakthrough. On the surface, you might think there's nothing wrong, since it gives more options for gamers looking for alternative ways to enjoy the game. However, gaming history have taught us anything, it is that not everyone will be happy. In other words, many Battlefield 6 players are upset.

Player Reactions: Anger to Support

"Gamers prefer human opponents. Don't repeat the mistakes of your rivals," reads one reply to the official announcement. "Truly disappointing concept," comments a different user. At the same time, in community forums, a player notes, "I have no idea where we are headed with this title," and someone else details all the issues they consider to be broken in the game: "Fix bugs, address drone issues, fix IVF rockets, fix [the] bloom after sprinting bug, improve hit detection. We don't need this AI-heavy playlist."

However, amid the criticism, there are players explaining how much they're liking the new mode. "It's very fun to warm up, human participants keep it from being a total farmfest but it's very relaxed," says one Reddit comment. "This subreddit fails to see that there are gamers who have lives and don't play this game all the time. Allow them to find a middle ground," adds a different comment. A response via social media explains that as they're "a battledad with limited time, this is great for me," while another praises the mode for "avoiding intense competition."

Valid Criticisms and Player Feedback

Despite the support, there are constructive reasons to complain about Casual Breakthrough. A few folks have highlighted that it will make wait times even longer for different playlists due to the large amount of options currently available. On a similar note, some areas often face mostly bots in the existing playlists. Additionally, it appears somewhat counterintuitive that the mode won't start without a minimum number of real players, even though it focuses mostly on fighting AI opponents.

Finally, a major complaints is that Battlefield Portal was promised to offer full XP, even against bots, but that got canned when they tried to remove XP farming from the system. So Casual Breakthrough feels like the player base compromising in the middle, as per a Reddit comment. A different user describes this addition as the devs "making a mistake so hard, I experienced great enjoyment in the first couple of days, what prompted them to adjust it?"

Future Prospects: Will Changes Be Made?

If the development team has proven anything to date with the latest installment, it is that they're paying attention and responding to player input. Tasks that were overly hard were adjusted very quickly, as did the specific battle pass objectives. It is likely that, if their data indicates this new playlist is underperforming to their expectations, they will not hesitate to make further modifications.