🔗 Share this article

The ninth circuit court has upheld a ban on sending state troops in Portland, Oregon, following a recent court ruling.

Judicial Panel Agrees to Rehear Case

The ninth circuit court of appeals ruled on this week that it would reexamine the case concerning the president’s authority with an expanded panel of 11 judges. The court also vacated a earlier decision from a smaller judicial group that had supported the administration.

Ongoing Dispute Over Troop Deployment

This order represents the most recent development in a protracted legal battle over whether the administration has the authority and valid reason to send national guard forces in the city. Approximately two hundred troops have been in uncertainty since late September when the deployment effort was initiated in response to ongoing demonstrations.

Conflicting Arguments

The administration has argued that government employees at the ICE facility in the southern part of the city were facing threats, while city and state officials maintain that local officers have command of the situation.

Contrary to descriptions of the city as “war ravaged”, locals have been sharing videos of scenic paths and a thriving food scene, and organizing events such as an Emergency Naked Bike Ride against the “militarization of our city”.

Court Proceedings

The Tuesday ruling came after a US district judge in the city enacted two temporary restraining orders this period – one blocking the federalization of the state troops, and another prohibiting the deployment of any military personnel in Oregon, after attempts to circumvent the initial injunction by mobilizing out-of-state forces.

On the previous day, the ninth circuit panel had temporarily suspended the initial decision – allowing command of state troops – but the subsequent injunction stayed effective, preventing the actual deployment of the troops.

En Banc Review

The Tuesday decision means the issue will be heard “en banc” – with both rulings under review simultaneously – by a group of eleven justices.

“This decision shows that the truth matters and that the judicial system are working to hold this administration accountable. The constitution restricts the president’s power, and local populations cannot be treated as a training ground for unchecked federal authority,” stated the state attorney general in a official comment.

“The judicial body is sending a definite signal: the executive leader cannot send the military into American urban areas without cause. We will continue protecting Oregon’s laws, principles, and sovereignty as this case progresses and our legal battle continues in the courts.”